142nd ASA Meeting, Fort Lauderdale, FL



Employing Fuzzy Logic and Noisy Speech
for Automatic Fitting of Hearing Aids

Bozena Kostek1,2  bozenka@sound.eti.pg.gda.pl
Andrzej Czyzewski2 andcz@ieee.org

1Institute of Physiology & Pathology of Hearing
Pstrowskiego 1 01-912 Warsaw, Poland

2Technical University of Gdansk
Sound & Vision Engineering Department
Narutowicza 11/12, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland
http://www.akustyka.com/
http://www.telewelfare.com/

Popular version of paper 2pPP10
Presented Tuesday Afternoon, December 4, 2001
142nd ASA Meeting, Fort Lauderdale, FL

SUMMARY

In this paper some limitations of the hearing-aid fitting process are discussed. In the fitting process, an audiologist performs tests on the wearer of the hearing aid, which is then adjusted based on the results of the test, with the goal of making the device work as best as it can for that individual. Traditional fitting procedures employ specialized testing devices which use artificial test signals. Ideally, however, the fitting of hearing aids should also simulate real-world conditions, such as listening to speech in the presence of background noise. Therefore, more satisfying and reliable fitting tests may be achieved through the use of multimedia computers equipped with a properly calibrated sound system. We have developed anew automatic system for fitting hearing aids. It employs fuzzy logic. In this process, a computer makes choices for adjusting the hearing aid's settings by analyzing the patient's responses and answering questions with replies that can lie somewhere between a simple "yes" or"no." This paper will describe the method and present some results of the experiments conducted to test the system.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

HEARING_AID_FITTING_STRATEGY_PRINCIPLES

CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION

Communication is essential for a properly functioning society. Hearing disorders are often a cause of communication problems. They can affect quality of life of persons with hearing loss. That is why the proper fitting of a hearing aid is a very important part of the recovery process for people with hearing problems. However, adequate fitting of a hearing aid depends on the experience of the patient's doctor as well as the capabilities of the testing equipment which enable audiologists to adjust the hearing aid. On the other hand, computer technology makes it practical to organize such tests based entirely on computer software.

There exist several limitations in the traditional clinical process of fitting hearing aids. Paradoxically, this is mainly due to the rapid progress of technology in the hearing-aid field. One can observe not only a change from analog to digital technology but also hearing device miniaturization, improved speech signal processing, better directional characteristics, etc. On the other hand the fitting process and the follow-up procedures typically remain the same as previously used, thus more sophisticated methods are needed. In addition, clinical assessment uses artificial signals; thus this process is far from the everyday settings in which hearing aids are used. It is especially true for people with hearing loss trying to communicate in noisy environment. This can dramatically increase the number of problems that a hearing aid user will encounter. The fitting procedures might be also long and tiring for a patient. Therefore there is a need to develop new strategies in hearing-aid fitting procedures and the supporting technology. A satisfying fitting strategy can be achieved through the use of modern multimedia computer technology with application of a properly calibrated sound system.

In the paper a new strategy that allows finding automatically characteristics of a hearing aid matching patients needs is shown briefly. The principles of the fitting method, some details of the devised system design, and results of experiments are also presented. back

HEARING AID FITTING STRATEGY PRINCIPLES

The proposed hearing aid fitting strategy employs a computer-based system. Apart from the computer a pair of properly calibrated earphones is used in testing [Ref_2][Ref_3]. This is to partially overcome the problem of impedance mismatches between the artificial cavity of the headphones and the ear. The earphones of choice are insert-type (in-ear) models. These earphones and the computer sound interface were calibrated using the artificial-ear setup.

A potential user of the system starts with the examination of loudness-growth characteristics in 4 frequency bands (a so-called LGOB procedure [Ref_1]). This is a procedure used in medical routines and it returns the hearing dynamic characteristics (4 dynamic expander curves such as the one showed in Fig_1a). Based on these characteristics it is possible to generally classify the case of hearing impairment represented by a given patient. These characteristics allow also finding the shape of proper compressor characteristics. This situation is illustrated in Fig_1b. Characteristics obtained in this way are used by the proposed system to simulate needed hearing aid performance. However, the standard method of measuring loudness growth characteristics employs filtered noise, whereas only the understanding of speech amidst noise can provide a final criterion for proper hearing aid fitting. Unfortunately, there are no means of direct mapping of standard loudness growth characteristics measured by noise to the characteristics corresponding to the compressed noisy speech understanding. That is why the empirical testing procedure should employ assessment of the level of understanding of speech patterns processed using adequately diversified compression curves (see the blue dashed lines in Fig_1b). The diversification of these curves can be decided by the system. The interest region for diversifying these curves is defined according to the evaluated degree of the hearing impairment. The principle of this evaluation can be as simple as that: the deeper the impairment, the wider is the interest region of diversified compression curves. However the interest region is established employing a fuzzy logic-based reasoning and a so-called . computing with words. approach [Ref_4][Ref_5][Ref_6].

a.

b.

Fig. 1. Exemplary loudness impression testing results for left and right ear representing the expansion characteristics (a), and dual characteristics constituting the compression curves that should be used for the processing of sound in suitable hearing aids (b). The interest region of compression curves is marked in dashed lines, representing its low and high boundaries. X-axes represent sound level, Y-axes reflect the subjective loudness level back_1

After the loudness impression characteristics are obtained for a given patient, and processed by the fuzzy logic engine, the system performs speech pattern testing. Speech signal is passing through four partially overlapping filter bands with the following middle frequencies are: 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. The signal dynamics are modeled in each band on the basis of sound compression characteristics. The processed signal is played back into the patient's headphones. The system stores 600 phonetically balanced audio-video recordings of simple sentences based on colloquial language. They are read partly by a female and by a male speaker. The patient listens to the recordings randomly chosen by the system during the test. The system shows synchronized video recordings of speakers' faces. This feature is needed for deeply hearing impaired patients who are capable of lipreading and allows assessment of lipreading influence to speech understanding.

After a single recording is played back and then received by the patient, the text of the sentence is shown on the screen. The patient self-estimates the level of understanding of the recording just played back using the established subjective assessment scale. Once the tests are completed the system analyzes the scores assigned by the patient to individual patterns played back.

On the basis of the results the system presents optimized dynamic characteristics of the hearing aid matching patient's needs. back

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper a new strategy for testing hearing with the use of an expert multimedia system has been outlined. This system may be helpful to properly diagnose patients and to give them some kind of sound experience before the hearing aid is selected for them. The hearing characteristics are assessed using the modified loudness scaling test. Since the compression curves derived from testing with filtered noise usually differ from compressor settings desired for optimal speech understanding, a special procedure has been established allowing for finding a region of interest for testing compression characteristics with processed speech patterns. Consequently, this region of interest is determined on the basis of extended loudness scaling test. The modification of the hearing aid fitting procedure lies in the introduction of fuzzy logic principles to the processing of results of testing loudness impression with filtered noise samples. The fuzzy processing of patients' responses employs membership functions identified by normally hearing population and in this way the degree of impairment for an individual is discovered.

The proper compression characteristics that should be used in the hearing aid of concrete patient are tested finally by speech patterns in order to optimize further speech understanding.
back

REFERENCES

  1. Allen B.J.B., Hall J.L., Jeng P.S., Loudness growth in ½ octave bands (LGOB) . A procedure for the assessment of loudness, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 88, (2), 745-753, 1990. back_1

  2. Czyżewski A., Kostek B., Suchomski P., Expert System for Hearing Aids Fitting, 108th AES Convention, Preprint No. 5094, Paris, France, 19-22.2.2000.back_1

  3. Czyzewski A., Kostek B., Expert Media Approach to Hearing Aids Fitting, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, ISSN 0884-8173 (R.R. Yager, Editor, J.F. Peters and A. Skowron, Guest Editors), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002 (in print). back_1

  4. Kostek B. Soft Computing in Acoustics, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica Verlag, Heilderberg, New York, 1999. back_1

  5. Zadeh L., Fuzzy sets, J. Information and Control, 8, 338-353, 1965. back_1

  6. Zadeh L., Kacprzyk J., Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, Wiley, New York, 1992. back_1

back